Hi folks

Discussions here and in another place have led me to question what I am actually doing when I say "I do Reiki".

I describe myself as a Reiki Master and Spiritual Healer, and view the two as being fundamentally different, with Reiki involving attunement to the Reiki and Spiritual Healing involving attunement to the client before invoking the healing energies. Yet I am now being told that the boundaries are blurred and I can't see how.

I don't follow the traditional Japanese Reiki, with the Japanese names for techniques, and the strict forms, hand positions - except when I'm teaching people, of course! I believe that I am not Japanese and I don't have the cultural background that Japanese people have, so I don't follow what is being described as "traditional", or "Japanese", or even "true" Reiki.

I come to Reiki from a Western, vaguely Christian metaphysical background, with my own spirituality and teachers. So when the Reiki principles tell me to "honour my teachers" I honour both Usui, Hayashi and Hawayo Takata but I also honour my spiritual healing teachers and my religious teachers.

Can what I'm doing still be described as Reiki? I am convinced that I give Reiki when I intend to give Reiki, and spiritual healing when I intend to give spiritual healing, but am I mistaken?

I'm not looking for yes/no answers here, I'm looking for a discussion about what I'm going through!

Pandora; I hear folks express the same feelings
that you write about here. It seems to me that
the Reiki System has many symbols,attunements,&
techniques that add a reverence to help practitioners
focus on ULFE. Many Reiki teachers have adapted
their own Reiki practice to being more western
thinking and breaking away from Japanese rituals
even though they do teach/pass these techniques
along to their students.

Hi Chris,

Pandora wrote:
I describe myself as a Reiki Master and Spiritual Healer, and view the two as being fundamentally different, with Reiki involving attunement to the Reiki and Spiritual Healing involving attunement to the client before invoking the healing energies. Yet I am now being told that the boundaries are blurred and I can't see how.

i'm not trained to be a spiritual healer, so can't comment on it specifically, although i feel a bit of understanding of very basics of Reiki, .

In a Reiki treatment, we're utilizing our own divine spark, our own spirit, to illicit a response (Reiki) in another. In an attunement, we're confering a part of our divine spark by way of a spiritual empowerment, onto another. These processes are somewhat unique, although not exclusive to Reiki.

The process, experience & response of spirtual healing may be somewhat different to say Quantum Touch, Pranayama, Qigong, etc. So, at what point does something cease to be all things, but come into a class of it's own? That's whay maybe we should all ask ourselves, .

The boundaries are blurred for folks who see all healing or spiritual paths as the same. There's nothing 'wrong' with that. Though, like i try to further identify items beyond a 'catch-all' term like 'food', likewise, i find that useful in other things. Being specific, .

Pandora wrote:
...so I don't follow what is being described as "traditional", or "Japanese", or even "true" Reiki.

I found out to my cost, those three above terms mean zilch, and merely mean 'authentic' to whatever they are currently teaching, .

Pandora wrote:
I come to Reiki from a Western, vaguely Christian metaphysical background, with my own spirituality and teachers. So when the Reiki principles tell me to "honour my teachers" I honour both Usui, Hayashi and Hawayo Takata but I also honour my spiritual healing teachers and my religious teachers.

Can what I'm doing still be described as Reiki?

Most definitely, . The principles are to be applied to our lives, of which, your spiritual healing is a part.

Pandora wrote:
I am convinced that I give Reiki when I intend to give Reiki, and spiritual healing when I intend to give spiritual healing, but am I mistaken?

Not at all. When i do Quantum Touch, it's QT. When i do Pranayama, it's Pranayama. Hatha Yoga is Hatha yoga. Kuji-in is Kuji-in. Qigong is Qigong. Perhaps with the slight exception of Kuji-in, for anyone who has studied the rest, it's pretty obvious, via the processes, what is being accessed (it is all the same), this is taking all aspects into account. With Reiki it is all different, this is taking all aspects into account.

Perhaps it is the same with spiritual healing?

Pandora wrote:
I'm not looking for yes/no answers here, I'm looking for a discussion about what I'm going through!

Really useful topic!

Take care
Wayne

Pandora wrote:Hi folks

Discussions here and in another place have led me to question what I am actually doing when I say "I do Reiki".

I describe myself as a Reiki Master and Spiritual Healer, and view the two as being fundamentally different, with Reiki involving attunement to the Reiki and Spiritual Healing involving attunement to the client before invoking the healing energies. Yet I am now being told that the boundaries are blurred and I can't see how.

I don't follow the traditional Japanese Reiki, with the Japanese names for techniques, and the strict forms, hand positions - except when I'm teaching people, of course! I believe that I am not Japanese and I don't have the cultural background that Japanese people have, so I don't follow what is being described as "traditional", or "Japanese", or even "true" Reiki.

I come to Reiki from a Western, vaguely Christian metaphysical background, with my own spirituality and teachers. So when the Reiki principles tell me to "honour my teachers" I honour both Usui, Hayashi and Hawayo Takata but I also honour my spiritual healing teachers and my religious teachers.

Can what I'm doing still be described as Reiki? I am convinced that I give Reiki when I intend to give Reiki, and spiritual healing when I intend to give spiritual healing, but am I mistaken?

I'm not looking for yes/no answers here, I'm looking for a discussion about what I'm going through!

I don’t believe Reiki and spiritual healing are mutually exclusive when you are in the process of facilitating a healing session. When you are allowing yourself to “be attuned to your client” with spiritual healing, I’d wager that Reiki assists the process.

And when you are letting Reiki flow, you are, in a way, attuning to your client.

Actually, Reiki, in my mind, can become a form of spiritual healing in and of itself. It certainly doesn’t necessarily start out that way to the beginner. But when you take it to a certain level, it ceases to become an outside force that you channel upon your client.

It is no longer part of separation consciousness. And that, I feel, is the whole basis of spiritual healing.

I think the blurring of the line… what you are going through… is essentially your “aha!” moment with what Reiki can actually be. That isn’t to say that what you have already been doing isn’t profound, potent, powerful, and pure.

But I think we can all agree, that as soon as we think we’ve “got” something, we learn that we don’t really. That there are always deeper levels to everything and we can explore those if we wish.

I think what you are going through, is one of those moments where you can luxuriate in exploration and learning something new about life, Reiki, spiritual healing, and yourself.

Enjoy it Sister!

Love and Light,

Milarepa wrote:Hi Chris,

Not at all. When i do Quantum Touch, it's QT. When i do Pranayama, it's Pranayama. Hatha Yoga is Hatha yoga. Kuji-in is Kuji-in. Qigong is Qigong. Perhaps with the slight exception of Kuji-in, for anyone who has studied the rest, it's pretty obvious, via the processes, what is being accessed (it is all the same), this is taking all aspects into account. With Reiki it is all different, this is taking all aspects into account.

Perhaps it is the same with spiritual healing?

I'd like to comment on this.

I think that Reiki can and will flow (unless you specifically intend for it not to, and then sometimes I don't think you have a choice) no matter what system you are using. Reiki can and will assist other systems, and other systems can assist Reiki. They can all be used in synergy.

Thaak wrote:


I'd like to comment on this.

I think that Reiki can and will flow (unless you specifically intend for it not to, and then sometimes I don't think you have a choice) no matter what system you are using. Reiki can and will assist other systems, and other systems can assist Reiki. They can all be used in synergy.

Yeah, this may be true for folks who think the above, i.e. sometimes one has no choice. Then by that very belief, it's self-fullfilling, no choice = not doing anything about it. .

That's not my own experience. If say, i'm sitting beside my missus, and i feel the familiar warmth in my hands, and she doesn't wish for Reiki, a simple internal 'no' stops it. Bearing in mind, any sensation we associate commonly with Reiki, doesn't mean Reiki is already 'flowing' anywhere. It doesn't 'go' anywhere anyhow. Free will works fine for me though, i've never experienced once not being able to do that.

Bear in mind though, 'Reiki' is 'emanating' (if i can use that term) outward form us at all times in all directions, this is why we are always protected incidentally. To a degree, we may affect others around us, as all humans do, even sitting in front of a PC all day does. The issue of how far we take this, bears on our responsibility, and leads obviosuly to permission.

Thaak wrote:
no matter what system you are using..

Like i tried to illustrate before, all spiritual or healing systems are not neccessarily accessing what Reiki Ryoho does. QT, Pranayam, Qigong (initially), we access from without, Reiki is accessed from within.

Thaak wrote:
Reiki can and will assist other systems, and other systems can assist Reiki. They can all be used in synergy.

Yes, this may be true if one wants this. This issue is though, whether this happens without one's knowledge. It doesn't for me. I guess it is to do with mindfulness also for me, which i'm kinda into, hehe. Like i indicated earlier, when i do one spiritual or healing modality, i'm solely doing that one, attempting to be fully in that path or technique. It's quite straight-forward for me, i'm expereincing Reiki when i fully wish to, i'm in total control. And why not, it's my life after all, hehe, .

Take care
Wayne

Milarepa wrote:

Thaak wrote:


I'd like to comment on this.

I think that Reiki can and will flow (unless you specifically intend for it not to, and then sometimes I don't think you have a choice) no matter what system you are using. Reiki can and will assist other systems, and other systems can assist Reiki. They can all be used in synergy.

Yeah, this may be true for folks who think the above, i.e. sometimes one has no choice. Then by that very belief, it's self-fullfilling, no choice = not doing anything about it. .

That's not my own experience. If say, i'm sitting beside my missus, and i feel the familiar warmth in my hands, and she doesn't wish for Reiki, a simple internal 'no' stops it. Bearing in mind, any sensation we associate commonly with Reiki, doesn't mean Reiki is already 'flowing' anywhere. It doesn't 'go' anywhere anyhow. Free will works fine for me though.

Thaak wrote:
no matter what system you are using..

Like i tried to illustrate before, all spiritual or healing systems are not neccessarily accessing what Reiki Ryoho does. QT, Pranayam, Qigong (initially), we access from without, Reiki is accessed from within.

Thaak wrote:
Reiki can and will assist other systems, and other systems can assist Reiki. They can all be used in synergy.

Yes, this may be true if one wants this. This issue is though, whether this happens without one's knowledge. It doesn't for me. I guess it is to do with mindfulness also for me, which i'm kinda into, hehe. Like i indicated earlier, when i do one spiritual or healing modality, i'm solely doing that one, attempting to be fully in that path or technique. It's quite straight-forward for me, i'm expereincing Reiki when i fully wish to, i'm in total control. And why not, it's my life after all, hehe, .

Take care
Wayne

Absolutely Wayne!

Mindfulness is very useful to the path to enlightenment.

Being fully present in the moment, and fully aware of what you are doing, is very useful to the path to enlightenment.

Just practicing these two things can bring so much joy, experiential beauty, and wonderment to one’s life. It can ultimately bring peace and happiness.

If your path to enlightenment, in collecting/realizing your own power, is to create a space of non-separation or reciprocation (Ayni) and oneness (Munay) by focusing on a single healing system at a time and fully enveloping yourself in it, then that is a beautiful thing.

On the other hand, I have chosen to release that particular control in my life, and let the lineage’s speak through me. This is not a release of mindfulness or being fully present. But rather not allowing myself to try and control the destiny that I have summoned.

EDIT: I didn't want to forget to mention that both ways are equally sound.

oh my goodness....why do some folks feel that Reiki and spiritual healing are two seperate things????

please break down the word REIKI........what does this mean to you????

Shakti ~ Rising wrote:oh my goodness....why do some folks feel that Reiki and spiritual healing are two seperate things????

please break down the word REIKI........what does this mean to you????

I don't think they are two separate things. Once you've read more of my posts, you'll see where I'm coming from.

my post wasn't directed at you hehe.. it's clear that you see no seperation....

Shakti ~ Rising wrote:my post wasn't directed at you hehe.. it's clear that you see no seperation....

Ah, ok. Just checkin... hehe

Shakti ~ Rising wrote:please break down the word REIKI........what does this mean to you????

"Spirit air." Now, break down the word KAMIKAZE. What does this mean to you????

Bruce

Well...ok

We perceive "one" and "separate" in different ways possibly, and again, it`s a different perception when viewing different objects...

The Universe in "one thing" yeah... I know what this means...on one level, or many....

My brain and spirit have the ability, together, or separately, for this interpretation. I can even experience all the elements at once, with out division, and still see them as individual....But I`m allowed to catagorize to enable a more detailed experience in my perception of it


Spirit is a general term that can mean different things...we all know this..

The air we breathe is defined as one thing, but "air" is composed of different elements that can be identified.

I believe spirit to be the same way...

There is spirit...and there is spirits...as in, one spirit, can reach out and connect with you....or you can reach out and connect with all, or just one teensy, weensy element of spirit

A generalization...spirit or energy...

Catagories..., for a deeper interpretation, Reiki, Pranic healing, spiritual healing...then oh,... lets go the personal route...Um...Shen, Qi, Jing, or if one prefers,..Ki...now lets really generalize...life force...


It`s mostly about the one perceiving the object, and to what depth they choose to dive...lol

Please...lets hear my fault in reasoning....I`ve been in this one before...this topic unravels like a wool sweater...lol


RJ

Sounds good bro!

i think i'll go have a bag of potatoes for a snack. Wait! I mean, a bag of french fries! No, a bag of potato chips/crips! Damn it, i'll just go into the shop and ask for a bag of potatoes, after all, it's all potatoe anyhow!

Bruce wrote:

Shakti ~ Rising wrote:please break down the word REIKI........what does this mean to you????

"Spirit air." Now, break down the word KAMIKAZE. What does this mean to you????

Bruce

a small camel-loo