Milarepa wrote:
So maybe we can both see now that all of us don't know everything, that we can all bring something to the table, and that there's more growth through the sharing with friends and being open to see if there's anything in what they say.
and if i bring my two cents up the table, i have to say that you two guys seem so sweet with horns locked like this....
the notion of 'i know' is not at all bad, and not necessarily it is all about ego all the time, rather it is the token of our individualistic presence amid the universal float of collective consciousness... so when i say 'i know' i m reaffirming my presence as a tiny drop in this unfathomable ocean of knowledge... negligible, when compared to the ocean itself, but quite the opposite, a basic ingredient of the ocean itself, when the composition is anaylyzed on the anatomy table
that symbols 'cannot' be placed in the auric or energy centers, and that symbols 'do' stand there... is all the figment of our material thinking, which we, unfortunately, have to resort to all the time as long as we intend to stay in the present realm called 'homo sapiens'
when we talk about symbols and about reiki, can't we borrow a mind that could help us to see the picture from sitting outside it... ? no, we cannot! since, the moment we defy the boundaries of our picture, that composes our presence, we defy many other things.... and only then, we might aptly say that symbols are neither placed within our auric shell, and nor they are placed otherwise, since they do something quite beyond the relative phenomenomenal meaningfulness of our material thinking....
a sidenote Wayne, beliving "too much" that symbols are placed within us, might lead us to take one picture all the time that yes they are placed us 'inside' us... (it is a fallacy we read into as some 'suggestive syndrome')
(over to you guys again, as i was greatly enjoying your chat
take care
salman












